Meeting Time: 07:00 AM PT / 03:00 PM UTC (See call time in different zones)
BRIDGE: https://zoom.us/j/184289009?pwd=aWRuMUs2dW5kUTNodS95UTZpTWh6QT09
Meeting Recording: TBA
(Example of collaborative meeting minutes, using Presos/Notes/Links: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TSC+2020-03-12)
Attendance
| Attended | Proxy (w/ @name) | Gov. Holiday | Did Not Attend |
|---|
Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat
| Fujitsu | Ampere Computing | |||
| Alicon | Red Hat | |||
| Zenlayer | China Unicom | |||
| Signalogic | Intel | |||
| Huawei | Juniper | |||
| Baidu | PGTalk | |||
| Tencent | Socnoc AI Inc. | |||
| Raedon | Arm | |||
| Equinix | Salesforce | |||
| AT&T | China Mobile Research Institute |
Time | Agenda Items | Presented By | Presos/ Notes Mark Shan /Links/ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Logistics and agenda bashing | All | |
| 10 | 2022 CI roadmap | Hi all! I wanted to check in and get an idea of what the Akraino project is going to need from the LF Release Engineering team in the coming year. My two questions that I'd like feedback on (from as many people as possible! Even if you don't have much to say, just hearing from people helps me gauge the level of interest/engagement) are: 1) Have there been any issues with CI that need to be fixed/improved? 2) Are there any new features or improvements that you would like to see implemented in the coming year? For example, is everyone satisfied with how self-service committer management via INFO files is working? Have releases been smooth? Are freestyle, JJB-based jobs still meeting your needs (we've been working on a Jenkins Pipeline library to implement similar functionality to global-jjb, since many projects have asked to move to pipelines)? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Eric Ball Release Engineer The Linux Foundation | |
| 10 | Proposal of 03/01/2022 - 03/03/2022 Akraino Technical Meetings - Spring | Ike Alisson | |
15 | Sub-committee Chair Updates
|
Action Items (Open Action Item Tracker)
Votes (template below)
Zoom Chat Log
Voting Template
TSC Voting to Approve CPS Robot Blueprint family - Akraino - Akraino Confluence:
Motion: Tina Tsou (Deactivated)
Second: Peter Pouliot khemendra kumar
| SL No. | Voting Member | Member Company | Y/N/A |
| 1 | Fujitsu | Y | |
| 2 | Alicon | Y | |
| 3 | Zenlayer | Y | |
| 4 | Signalogic | ||
| 5 | Huawei | Y | |
| 6 | Baidu | ||
| 7 | Tencent | Y | |
| 8 | Raedon | ||
| 9 | Equinix | Y | |
| 10 | (w/ Paul Carver ) | AT&T | |
| 11 | Ampere Computing | Y | |
| 12 | Red Hat | ||
| 13 | China Unicom | ||
| 14 | Intel | Y | |
| 15 | Juniper | ||
| 16 | PGTalk | Y | |
| 17 | Socnoc AI Inc. | ||
| 18 | Arm | Y | |
| 19 | Salesforce | ||
| 20 | China Mobile Research Institute | Y |