...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Sdewan config agent is the controller of Sdewan CRDs. With the config agent, we are able to deploy CNFs. In this page, we have the following terms, let's define them here.
...
Table of Contents
Goal
Sdewan CRD Controller (config agent) is the controller of Sdewan CRDs. With the CRD Controller, we are able to deploy Sdewan CRs to configure CNF rules. In this page, we have the following terms, let's define them here.
- CNF Deployment: A deployment running network function process(openWRT)
- Sdewan rule: The rule defines the CNF behaves. We have 3 classes of rules: mwan3, firewall, ipsec. Each class includes several kinds of rules. For example, mwan3 has 2 kinds: mwan3_policy and mwan3_rule. Firewall has 5 kinds: firewall_zone, firewall_snat, firewall_dnat, firewall_forwarding, firewall_rule. Ipsec has xx(ruoyu) kinds: xx, xx.
- Sdewan rule CRD: The CRD defines each kind of sdewan rule. For each kind of Sdewan rule, we have a Sdewan rule CRD. Sdewan rule CRD is namespaced resource.
- Sdewan rule CR: Instance of Sdewan rule CRD.
- Sdewan controller: The controller watching Sdewan rule CRs.
- CNF: A network function running in container.
To deploy a CNF, user needs to create one CNF deployment and some Sdewan rule CRs. In a Kubernetes namespace, there could be more than one CNF deployment and many Sdewan rule CRs. We use label to correlate one CNF with some Sdewan rule CRs. The Sdewan controller watches Sdewan rule CRs and applies them onto the correlated CNF by calling CNF REST api.
Sdwan Design Principle
- There could be multiple tenants/namespaces in a Kubernetes cluster. User may deploy multiple CNFs in any one or more tenants.
- The replica of CNF deployment could be more than one for active/backup purpose. We should apply rules for all the pods under CNF deployment. (This release doesn't implement VRRP between pods)
- CNF deployment and Sdewan rule CRs can be created/updated/deleted in any order
- The Sdewan controller and CNF process could be crash/restart at anytime for some reasons. We need to handle these scenarios
- Each Sdewan rule CR has labels to identify the type it belongs to. 3 types are available at this time:
basic
,app-intent
andk8s-service
. We extend k8s user role permission so that we can set user permission at type level of Sdewan rule CR - Sdewan rule CR dependencies are checked on creating/updating/deleting. For example, if we create a mwan3_rule CR which uses policy
policy-x
, but no mwan3_policy CR namedpolicy-x
exists. Then we block the request
Architecture
CNF Deployment
In this section we describe what the CNF deployment should be like, as well as the pod under the deployment.
- CNF pod should has multiple network interfaces attached. We use multus and ovn4nfv CNIs to enable multiple interfaces. So in the CNF pod yaml, we set annotations:
k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks
,k8s.plugin.opnfv.org/nfn-network
. - When user deploys a CNF, she/he most likely want to deploy the CNF on a specified node instead of a random node. Because some nodes may don't have provider network connected. So we set
spec.nodeSelector
for pod - CNF pod runs Sdewan CNF (based on openWRT in ICN). We use image
integratedcloudnative/openwrt:dev
- CNF pod should setup with rediness probe. Sdewan controller would check pod readiness before calling CNF REST api.
...
language | yml |
---|---|
title | CNF pod |
...
SDEWAN CRD Controller internally calls SDEWAN Restful API to do CNF configuration. And a remote client (e.g. SDEWAN Overlay Controller) can manage SDEWAN CNF configuration through creating/updating/deleting SDEWAN CRs. It includes below components:
- MWAN3 Controller: monitor mwan3 related CR change then do mwan3 configuration in SDEWAN CNF
- Firewall Controller: monitor firewall related CR change then do firewall configuration in SDEWAN CNF
- IpSec Controller: monitor ipsec related CR change then do ipsec configuration in SDEWAN CNF
- Service/Application Controller: configure firewall/NAT rule for in-cluster service and application
- Runtime controller: collect runtime information of CNF include IPSec, IKE, firewall/NAT connections, DHCP leases, DNS entries, ARP entries etc..
- BucketPerssion/LabelValidateWebhook: do sdewan CR request permission check based on CR label and user
CNF Deployment
In this section we describe what the CNF deployment should be like, as well as the pod under the deployment.
- CNF pod should has multiple network interfaces attached. We use multus and ovn4nfv CNIs to enable multiple interfaces. So in the CNF pod yaml, we set annotations:
k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks
,k8s.plugin.opnfv.org/nfn-network
. - When user deploys a CNF, she/he most likely want to deploy the CNF on a specified node instead of a random node. Because some nodes may don't have provider network connected. So we set
spec.nodeSelector
for pod - CNF pod runs Sdewan CNF (based on openWRT in ICN). We use image
integratedcloudnative/openwrt:dev
- CNF pod should setup with rediness probe. Sdewan controller would check pod readiness before calling CNF REST api.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: cnf-1
namespace: default
labels:
sdewanPurpose: cnf-1
spec:
replicas: 1
strategy:
rollingUpdate:
maxSurge: 25%
maxUnavailable: 25%
type: RollingUpdate
template:
metadata:
annotations:
k8s.plugin.opnfv.org/nfn-network: |-
{ "type": "ovn4nfv", "interface": [
{
"defaultGateway": "false",
"interface": "net0",
"name": "ovn-priv-net"
},
{
"defaultGateway": "false",
"interface": "net1",
"name": "ovn-provider-net1"
},
{
"defaultGateway": "false",
"interface": "net2",
"name": "ovn-provider-net2"
}
]}
k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks: '[{ "name": "ovn-networkobj"}]'
spec:
containers:
- command:
- /bin/sh
- /tmp/sdewan/entrypoint.sh
image: integratedcloudnative/openwrt:dev
name: sdewan
readinessProbe:
failureThreshold: 5
httpGet:
path: /
port: 80
scheme: HTTP
initialDelaySeconds: 5
periodSeconds: 5
successThreshold: 1
timeoutSeconds: 1
securityContext:
privileged: true
procMount: Default
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: /tmp/sdewan
name: example-sdewan
readOnly: true
nodeSelector:
kubernetes.io/hostname: ubuntu18 |
Sdewan rule CRs
CRD defines all properties of a resource, but it's not human friendly. So we paste Sdewan rule CR samples instead of CRDs.
- Each Sdewan rule CR has a label named
sdewanPurpose
to indicate which CNF should the rule be applied onto - Each Sdewan rule CR has the
status
field which indicates if the latest rule is applied and when it's applied Mwan3Policy.spec.members[].network
should match the networks defined in CNF pod annotationk8s.plugin.opnfv.org/nfn-network
. As well asFirewallZone.spec[].network
...
Mwan3Policy.spec.members[].network
should match the networks defined in CNF pod annotationk8s.plugin.opnfv.org/nfn-network
. As well asFirewallZone.spec[].network
CR samples of Mwan3 type:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
apiVersion: batch.sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1
kind: Mwan3Policy
metadata:
name: balance1
namespace: default
labels:
sdewanPurpose: cnf-1
spec:
members:
- network: ovn-net1
weight: 2
metric: 2
- network: ovn-net2
weight: 3
metric: 3
status:
appliedVersion: "2"
appliedTime: "2020-03-29T04:21:48Z"
inSync: True |
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
apiVersion: batch.sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: Mwan3PolicyMwan3Rule metadata: name: balance1http_rule namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 spec: memberspolicy: balance1 - network: ovn-net1 weight: src_ip: 192.168.1.2 metric: 2 - network: ovn-net2 weight: 3 metric: 3dest_ip: 0.0.0.0/0 dest_port: 80 proto: tcp status: appliedVersion: "2" appliedTime: "2020-03-29T04:21:48Z" inSync: True |
CR samples of Firewall type:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
apiVersion: batch.sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: Mwan3RuleFirewallZone metadata: name: http_rulelan1 namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 spec: policy newtork: balance1 src_ip: 192.168.1.2 - dest_ip: 0.0.0.0/0ovn-net1 dest_portinput: 80ACCEPT protooutput: tcpACCEPT status: appliedVersion: "2" appliedTime: "2020-03-29T04:21:48Z" inSync: True |
...
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
apiVersion: batch.sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: FirewallZoneFirewallRule metadata: name: lan1reject_80 namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 spec: newtorksrc: lan1 - ovn-net1 src_ip: 192.168.1.2 src_port: 80 inputproto: ACCEPTtcp outputtarget: ACCEPTREJECT status: appliedVersion: "2" appliedTime: "2020-03-29T04:21:48Z" inSync: True |
...
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
apiVersion: batch.sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: FirewallRuleFirewallSNAT metadata: name: rejectsnat_80lan1 namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 spec: src: lan1 src_ip: 192.168.1.2 src_portdip: 801.2.3.4 protodest: tcpwan1 targetproto: REJECTicmp status: appliedVersion: "2" appliedTime: "2020-03-29T04:21:48Z" inSync: True |
...
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
apiVersion: batch.sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: FirewallSNATFirewallDNAT metadata: name: snatdnat_lan1wan1 namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 spec: src: lan1wan1 src_ip: 192.168.1.2dport: 19900 dest: lan1 srcdest_dipip: 1192.2168.31.41 dest_port: wan122 proto: icmptcp status: appliedVersion: "2" appliedTime: "2020-03-29T04:21:48Z" inSync: True |
...
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
apiVersion: batch.sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: FirewallDNATFirewallForwarding metadata: name: dnat_wan1 forwarding_lan_to_wan namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 spec: src: wan1 src_dport: 19900 dest: lan1 dest_ip: 192.168.1.1 dest_port: 22 proto: tcpwan1 status: appliedVersion: "2" appliedTime: "2020-03-29T04:21:48Z" inSync: True |
CR samples of IPSec type(ruoyu):
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
apiVersion: batch.sdewan sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: FirewallForwarding IpsecProposal metadata: name: forwarding_lan_to_wan name: test_proposal_1 namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 specspec: encryption_algorithm: aes128 srchash_algorithm: lan1sha256 destdh_group: wan1modp3072 status: appliedVersion: "21" appliedTime: "2020-0304-29T0412T09:2128:48Z38Z" inSync: True |
CR samples of IPSec type(ruoyu):
|
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
apiVersion: sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: IpsecProposal IpsecSite metadata: name: test_proposal_1 ipsecsite-sample namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 spec: encryption_algorithm: aes128 remote: xx.xx.xx.xx authentication_method: psk hashpre_shared_algorithmkey: sha256xxx dhlocal_public_groupcert: modp3072 status local_private_cert: appliedVersionshared_ca: "1" appliedTime: "2020-04-12T09:28:38Z"local_identifier: remote_identifier: inSynccrypto_proposal: True | ||||
Code Block | ||||
| ||||
apiVersion: sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: IpsecSite metadata: name: ipsecsite-sample- test_proposal_1 namespaceconnections: default labels: - connection_name: connection_A sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 spec: remotetype: xx.xx.xx.xxtunnel authentication_method: psk pre_shared_keymode: xxxstart local_public_cert: local_private_certsubnet: 172.12.0.0/24, shared_ca:10.239.160.22 local_identifier: remote_identifier:sourceip: 172.12.0.30-172.12.0.45 cryptoremote_proposalsubnet: - testcrypto_proposal_1: connections: - connection_nametest_proposal_1 status: connection_A appliedVersion: "1" type: tunnel mode: start local_subnet: 172.12.0.0/24, 10.239.160.22 appliedTime: "2020-04-12T09:28:38Z" inSync: True |
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
apiVersion: sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: IpsecHost metadata: name: ipsechost-sample namespace: default labels: remote_sourceipsdewanPurpose: 172.12.0.30-172.12.0.45cnf-1 spec: remote: xx.xx.xx.xx/%any remoteauthentication_subnetmethod: psk crypto_proposalpre_shared_key: xxx local_public_cert: - test_proposal_1 statuslocal_private_cert: appliedVersion: "1"shared_ca: appliedTime: "2020-04-12T09:28:38Z"local_identifier: inSyncremote_identifier: True | ||||
Code Block | ||||
| ||||
apiVersion: sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: IpsecHost metadata: name: ipsechost-sample namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf-1 spec: remote: xx.xx.xx.xx/%any authentication_method: psk pre_shared_key: xxx local_public_cert:crypto_proposal: - test_proposal_1 connections: - connection_name: connection_A type: tunnel mode: start local_private_certsourceip: %config shared_ca: local_identifier: remote_identifiersourceip: xx.xx.xx.xx crypto_proposal: - test_proposal_1 connections:remote_subnet: xx.xx.xx.xx/xx - connectioncrypto_nameproposal: connection_A type: tunnel- test_proposal_1 status: modeappliedVersion: start"1" local_sourceip: %config remote_sourceip: xx.xx.xx.xx remote_subnet: xx.xx.xx.xx/xx crypto_proposalappliedTime: "2020-04-12T09:28:38Z" inSync: True |
CNF Service CR
.spec.fullname - The full name of the target service, with which we can get the service IP
.spec.port - The port exposed by CNF, we will do DNAT for the requests accessing this port of CNF
.spec.dport - The port exposed by target service
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
apiVersion: batch.sdewan.akraino.org/v1alpha1 kind: CNFService metadata: name: cnfservice-sample namespace: default labels: sdewanPurpose: cnf1 spec: - test_proposal_1 statusfullname: httpd-svc.default.svc.cluster.local appliedVersion port: "12288" appliedTime dport: "2020-04-12T09:28:38Z8080" inSync: True |
Sdewan rule CRD Reconcile Logic
As we have many kinds of CRDs, they have almost the same reconcile logic. So we only describe the Mwan3Rule logic.
...
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
def Mwan3RuleReconciler.Reconcile(req ctrl.Request): rule_cr = k8sClient.get(req.NamespacedName) cnf_deployment = k8sClient.get_deployment_with_label(rule_cr.labels.sdewanPurpose) if rule_cr DeletionTimestamp exists: # The CR is being deleted. finalizer on the CR if cnf_deployment exists: if cnf_deployment is ready: for cnf_pod in cnf_deployment: err = openwrt_client.delete_rule(cnf_pod_ip, rule_cr) if err: return "re-queue req" rule_cr.finalizer = nil return "ok" else: return "re-queue req" else: # Just remove finalizer, because no CNF pod exists rule_cr.finalizer = nil return "ok" else: # The CR is not being deleted if cnf_deployment not exist: return "ok" else: if cnf_deployment not ready: # set appliedVersion = nil if cnf_deployment get into not_ready status rule_cr.status.appliedVersion = nil return "re-queue req" else: for cnf_pod in cnf_deployment: runtime_cr = openwrt_client.get_rule(cnf_pod_ip) if runtime_cr != rule_cr: err = openwrt_client.add_or_update_rule(cnf_pod_ip, rule_cr) if err: # err could be caused by dependencies not-applied or other reason return "re-queue req" # set appliedVerson only when it's applied for all the cnf pods rule_cr.finalizer = cnf_finalizer rule_cr.status.appliedVersion = rule_cr.resourceVersion rule_cr.status.inSync = True return "ok" |
Unsual Cases
In the following cases, when we say "call CNF api to create/update/delte rule", it means the logic below:
...
- A deployment(CNF) for a given purpose has two pod replicas (CNF-pod-1 and CNF-pod-2)
- Controller is also brought yup.
- CNF-pod-1 and CNF-pod-2 are both running with no/default configuration.
- MWAN3 policy 1 is added
- MWAN3 rule 1 and Rule 2 are added to use MWAN3 Policy1.
- Since all controller, CNF-pod-1 and CNF-pod-2 are running, CNF-pod-1 and CNF-pod-2 has configuration MWAN3 Policy1, rule1 and rule2.
- Controller is down for 10 minutes.
After controller goes down, CNF-pod-1 is down
Info As controller is down, so no event, no reconcile. MWAN3 rule 1 is deleted.
Info As controller is down, so no event, no reconcile. rule1 CR is not deleted from etcd because of finalizer. Instead, DeleteTimestamp is added to rule1 CR by k8s MWAN3 rule 3 added
Info As controller is down, no event no reconcile. rule3 CR is added to etcd, but not applied onto CNF. rule3 status.appliedVersion and status.appliedTime and status.inSync are nil/default value. - For MWAN3 rule 2, we don't make any change
CNF-pod-1 is up
Info As controller is down, so no event, no reconcile. As pod restart, CNF-pod-1 is running with no/default configuration. Controller is up.
Info Controller reconciles for all CRs. For rule1 CR, controller calls cnf api to delete rule1 from both CNF-pod-1 and CNF-pod-2. Then controller removes finalizer from the rule1 CR, then rule1 CR is deleted from etcd by k8s. For rule2, controller calls cnf api to update rul2 for both CNF-pod-1 and CNF-pod-2. Then set rule2 status.appliedVersion=<current-version> and status.appliedTime=<now-time> and status.inSync=true. For rule3, controller calls cnf api to add rul3 for both CNF-pod-1 and CNF-pod-2. Then set rule3 finalizer. Also set rule3 status.appliedVersion=<current-version> and status.appliedTime=<now-time> and status.inSync=true. Ensure that CNF-pod-1 and CNF-pod-2 have latest configuration and there is no duplicate information.
Info Once the reconcile finish, both CNF-pod-1 and CNF-pod-2 have latest configuration.
Admission Webhook Usage
We use admission webhook to implemention several features.
- Prevent creating more than one CNF of the same lable and the same namespace
- Validate CR dependencies. For example, mwan3 rule depends on mwan3 policy
- Extend user permission to control the operations on rule CRs. For example, we can control that ONAP can't update/delete rule CRs created by platform.
Sdewan rule CR type level Permission Implementation
8s support permission control on namespace level. For example, user1 may be able to create/update/delete one kind of resource(e.g. pod) in namespace ns1, but not namespace ns2. For Sdewan, this can't fit our requirement. We want label level control of Sdewan rule CRs. For example, user_onap can create/update/delete Mwan3Rule CR of label sdewan-bucket-type=app-intent
, but not label sdewan-bucket-type=basic
.
...
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
def mwan3rule_webhook_handle_permission(req admission.Request): userinfo = req["userInfo] mwan3rule_cr = decode(req) roles = k8s_client.get_role_from_user(userinfo) for role in roles: if mwan3rule_cr.labels.sdewan-bucket-type in role.annotation.sdewan-bucket-type-permission.mwan3rules: return {"allowd": True} return {"allowd": False} |
ServiceRule controller (For next release)
We create a controller watches the services created in the cluster. For each service, it creates a FirewallDNAT CR. On controller startup, it makes a syncup to remove unused CRs.
References
- https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/blob/master/pkg/doc.go
- https://book.kubebuilder.io/reference/using-finalizers.html
- https://godoc.org/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/predicate#example-Funcs
- https://godoc.org/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/handler#example-EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc
...